Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » AR-15 / M-16 Retro Forum
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Site Notices
Posted: 4/19/2024 11:36:32 AM EDT
I expect that this is going to run me around $2-2.5K when all is said and done.

So far, here's what I've put together.  Some parts are new, some are used.  My intent is not to use vintage parts, but to use parts that look correct to provide the proper look, but has better reliability than an original would have had.  It'll also be my first AR that uses the "grey" receivers.  A benefit is that essentially all of the 607's were "parts-bin" builds by Colt, so they vary.  Some have the full A1 grip, some are cut.  Some have the FA, some are slickside.  I've opted to go with the FA and will use a full A1 grip.  Another decision is that I am attempting to use an 11.5" barrel instead of a 10" barrel, with a slip-on XM177 moderator that will go over the barrel so that it appears to have a 10" barrel.  We'll have to see how that turns out.

What I have so far:

NDS/Brownells "retro" A1 receiver, lightly used (grey) w/teardrop FA and no bayo lug on FSB.  Proper .625 profile.
H&R GX-5857 grey receiver from PSA
Grey slip ring
11.5" Colt barrel assembly (used) - has a non flared end of the barrel, but was not "cut down"
Carbine triangle handguards (trying to decide if these are OK, or if I need to go the route of cutting down real ones and using the proprietary end cap, but will begin with these.
607 stock assembly from Ordnance Research - ouch - that one hurt, badly...  $810 by itself
H&R LPK from PSA - proper for grey lowers
A1 grip (vintage, mottled)
phosphate BCG
standard charging handle
SBR tax stamp (of course)

Still trying to work out the moderator...
Link Posted: 4/19/2024 7:25:46 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Shane733] [#1]
Sherluck has the 607 handguard caps for $25. He is the only one I know who has any. They are not the proper ones but they work. I grabbed me a couple a while back. Just mentioning it incase you want to grab one before they are all gone. https://www.sherluk.com/m16e.php

I grabbed me a couple real handguards from Numrich for mine. I cut them down on the miter saw at 3 degrees. 6 3/8" long. I found an old thread on here that said as such. (see below) No idea if this is right but it worked for me. The carbide tip blade spinning at 4k rpm went through them like hot butter. (cut slow. wear safety glasses) The angle and length worked out great for me. I pulled the slip ring back as for as it would go and they slipped in with about 1/16" - 1/8" to clear. The slip ring seems to sit pretty straight too. https://imgur.com/a/JXmQA8O

The carbine handguards look fine on the 607 but just throwing this out there incase you decide to go the original route.




"Handguards 6 3/8" length ***NOTE:  Model 1 sales cuts them to 6 1/4 inches."


"When you get to the miter saw part...

Put the bottom of the handguard against the miter saw fence with the receiver end facing the blade.

Lower the blade and slide the rear of the handguards until they touch the blade.

Adjust the miter so that the saw makes full contact with the flat part of the handguard where the slipring will go.

This will be the angle for the cut.

Same for the other side of the handguard, just the miter will be the opposite direction."

Link Posted: 4/19/2024 9:14:40 PM EDT
[#2]
I built a lower for a customer using one of those repro stocks (original stock body, new other parts and hardware I guess). It was a very complicated process. Threading the receiver, threading the slide rod to match, drilling the cross hole that retains the slide rod AND the takedown pin detent & spring, and cross drilling the slide rod for the buffer retainer and spring.

I would suggest having the stock fitting work done before stamping the lower, that way in the event something happens, you're not totally out a stamp.
Link Posted: 4/19/2024 11:18:13 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 19Charlie_84:
I built a lower for a customer using one of those repro stocks (original stock body, new other parts and hardware I guess). It was a very complicated process. Threading the receiver, threading the slide rod to match, drilling the cross hole that retains the slide rod AND the takedown pin detent & spring, and cross drilling the slide rod for the buffer retainer and spring.

I would suggest having the stock fitting work done before stamping the lower, that way in the event something happens, you're not totally out a stamp.
View Quote
You don't have to do any of that with the stock I got.
Link Posted: 4/19/2024 11:24:00 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Shane733:
Sherluck has the 607 handguard caps for $25. He is the only one I know who has any. They are not the proper ones but they work. I grabbed me a couple a while back. Just mentioning it incase you want to grab one before they are all gone. https://www.sherluk.com/m16e.php

I grabbed me a couple real handguards from Numrich for mine. I cut them down on the miter saw at 3 degrees. 6 3/8" long. I found an old thread on here that said as such. (see below) No idea if this is right but it worked for me. The carbide tip blade spinning at 4k rpm went through them like hot butter. (cut slow. wear safety glasses) The angle and length worked out great for me. I pulled the slip ring back as for as it would go and they slipped in with about 1/16" - 1/8" to clear. The slip ring seems to sit pretty straight too. https://imgur.com/a/JXmQA8O

The carbine handguards look fine on the 607 but just throwing this out there incase you decide to go the original route.




"Handguards 6 3/8" length ***NOTE:  Model 1 sales cuts them to 6 1/4 inches."


"When you get to the miter saw part...

Put the bottom of the handguard against the miter saw fence with the receiver end facing the blade.

Lower the blade and slide the rear of the handguards until they touch the blade.

Adjust the miter so that the saw makes full contact with the flat part of the handguard where the slipring will go.

This will be the angle for the cut.

Same for the other side of the handguard, just the miter will be the opposite direction."

View Quote
I'm still not convinced that I want to do that cap.  Is the only way to get that cap on by removing the FSB (the forward triangle cap is already on), or can it slip over the barrel nut if the slip ring assembly is removed?
Link Posted: 4/20/2024 3:58:04 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By jtb33:
I'm still not convinced that I want to do that cap.  Is the only way to get that cap on by removing the FSB (the forward triangle cap is already on), or can it slip over the barrel nut if the slip ring assembly is removed?
View Quote


It will slip over the barrel nut.
Link Posted: 4/20/2024 4:09:12 PM EDT
[#6]
Do the handguard cap. I think those ready made triangle handguards look terrible.
Link Posted: 4/20/2024 8:45:42 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By jtb33:
You don't have to do any of that with the stock I got.
View Quote


Sweet! Dude must have changed the design since I built that one.
Link Posted: 4/21/2024 12:50:04 AM EDT
[#8]
Originally Posted By jtb33:
Another decision is that I am attempting to use an 11.5" barrel instead of a 10" barrel, with a slip-on XM177 moderator that will go over the barrel so that it appears to have a 10" barrel.  We'll have to see how that turns out.


Still trying to work out the moderator...
View Quote



If you find a moderator like that, please let me know. I'm using an 11.5" barrel, and with the moderator it's right at 15.5". Looks too much like a ghetto pin and weld job for my likes.


Link Posted: 4/21/2024 11:03:35 AM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Kalahnikid:
Do the handguard cap. I think those ready made triangle handguards look terrible.
View Quote


Agree 100%.

Does heat beat still make the HG caps? That is who I got mine from.
Link Posted: 4/21/2024 6:50:25 PM EDT
[#10]
I took my mutt 607 clone to the range to sight in and test for function today.

It likes lube. Lots of it. I only shot about 100 rounds.


Link Posted: 4/21/2024 9:16:59 PM EDT
[#11]
If you go with the Ordnance Research stock, they are cool.

Stake it at the buffer tube. Small stake.


Link Posted: 4/22/2024 12:20:54 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Shane733] [#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TheYellowThing:
If you go with the Ordnance Research stock, they are cool.

Stake it at the buffer tube. Small stake.


View Quote


Can you stake them without a stake notch? I did the airsoft stock guts for mine but same set up as Ordinance Research I think as far as attaching. I had to use a strap wrench to tighten. I feel like it needed to be tighter or staked or something. Did you cut a notch or just stake? You got a close up of your staking? https://imgur.com/a/86lAi0Q
Link Posted: 4/22/2024 10:13:07 PM EDT
[Last Edit: jtb33] [#13]
I didn't realize that some of the 607's had a full-fence lower.  Though I guess his could also be a lower from an M16A1 or an XM177E2...

ETA:  Yes, I am dumb - it's an XM177E1.  

Attachment Attached File

Link Posted: 4/22/2024 10:17:55 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By jtb33:
I didn't realize that some of the 607's had a full-fence lower.  Though I guess his could also be a lower from an M16A1 or an XM177E2...

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/42132/Colt_609_XM177E1_on_Time_Life__70934_jpg-3195543.JPG
View Quote


Im not sure where you're getting 607 out of that picture, its clearly a late XM177E1.
Link Posted: 4/22/2024 10:29:44 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Kalahnikid:


Im not sure where you're getting 607 out of that picture, its clearly a late XM177E1.
View Quote


You're correct.  
Link Posted: 4/22/2024 10:40:21 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By jtb33:
I didn't realize that some of the 607's had a full-fence lower.  Though I guess his could also be a lower from an M16A1 or an XM177E2...

ETA:  Yes, I am dumb - it's an XM177E1.  

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/42132/Colt_609_XM177E1_on_Time_Life__70934_jpg-3195543.JPG
View Quote

Sweet
Link Posted: 4/23/2024 11:36:46 PM EDT
[Last Edit: TheYellowThing] [#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Shane733:


Can you stake them without a stake notch? I did the airsoft stock guts for mine but same set up as Ordinance Research I think as far as attaching. I had to use a strap wrench to tighten. I feel like it needed to be tighter or staked or something. Did you cut a notch or just stake? Y
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Shane733:
Originally Posted By TheYellowThing:
If you go with the Ordnance Research stock, they are cool.

Stake it at the buffer tube. Small stake.




Can you stake them without a stake notch? I did the airsoft stock guts for mine but same set up as Ordinance Research I think as far as attaching. I had to use a strap wrench to tighten. I feel like it needed to be tighter or staked or something. Did you cut a notch or just stake? Y
See below.
Link Posted: 4/23/2024 11:38:02 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Shane733:


Can you stake them without a stake notch? I did the airsoft stock guts for mine but same set up as Ordinance Research I think as far as attaching. I had to use a strap wrench to tighten. I feel like it needed to be tighter or staked or something. Did you cut a notch or just stake? You got a close up of your staking? https://imgur.com/a/86lAi0Q
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Shane733:
Originally Posted By TheYellowThing:
If you go with the Ordnance Research stock, they are cool.

Stake it at the buffer tube. Small stake.




Can you stake them without a stake notch? I did the airsoft stock guts for mine but same set up as Ordinance Research I think as far as attaching. I had to use a strap wrench to tighten. I feel like it needed to be tighter or staked or something. Did you cut a notch or just stake? You got a close up of your staking? https://imgur.com/a/86lAi0Q
I posted in another thread on accident.

My tube was working loose.

Stake here.



Link Posted: 4/23/2024 11:59:33 PM EDT
[#19]
Well, I tried to stick to my plan for keeping the 11.5" barrel and getting a fake OTB moderator, but both of the guys who have made XM177 moderators said that it's not possible to do because it would be too thin.  I'd have to reprofile the barrel thinner than it already is, so I am just going to have ADCO cut the 11.5" down to a 10".  Just sent it in today.  I expect turnaround to take about 2-3 weeks with shipping both ways, and then I can finish this build.
Link Posted: 4/25/2024 11:56:17 PM EDT
[Last Edit: jtb33] [#20]
...
Link Posted: 4/26/2024 12:33:08 AM EDT
[#21]
@TheYellowThing or anyone with an Ordnance Research stock, I have a question.

I am terrible at explaining things so hope you can follow. A standard A1 / A2 or entry buffer tube is made to normally be tightened down right up against the receiver. This allows the threaded part to barely go over the buffer retaining hole to hold the buffer retainer pin in. When you put a receiver end plate on one, it does not screw in far enough. When I built mine, I spent weeks looking for the correct buffer tube. I just ended up using the standard entry length buffer tube. Then I had to cut about an 1/8" piece off another buffer tube to hold my buffer retainer pin in place. Apparently Ordnance Research are using buffer tubes with longer than standard threads. Anyone have any idea where Ordnance Research is getting their buffer tubes?
Link Posted: 4/26/2024 1:14:47 AM EDT
[Last Edit: wood714] [#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By jtb33:
Well, I tried to stick to my plan for keeping the 11.5" barrel and getting a fake OTB moderator, but both of the guys who have made XM177 moderators said that it's not possible to do because it would be too thin.  I'd have to reprofile the barrel thinner than it already is, so I am just going to have ADCO cut the 11.5" down to a 10".  Just sent it in today.  I expect turnaround to take about 2-3 weeks with shipping both ways, and then I can finish this build.
View Quote


I've sent 2 barrels to JT at Retro Arms Works. Took 3 days for him to get them, he did his thing the day he got them and shipped them back that same day.
Link Posted: 4/26/2024 6:15:04 AM EDT
[#23]
Question about the Ordnance Research 607 stock. Is this a rock solid adjustable stock? Tight lock up? Easy to extend/retract?
Link Posted: 4/26/2024 3:16:17 PM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By timkel:
Question about the Ordnance Research 607 stock. Is this a rock solid adjustable stock? Tight lock up? Easy to extend/retract?
View Quote
Yes. The lock up is solid both closed and extended. Make certain to lube both the buffer tube and lower guide rod/tube.

I had an issue with mine becoming difficult to slide open and closed after shooting it for awhile. A little oil wiped on the outside of both tubes and it was fine.



Link Posted: 4/30/2024 4:31:41 PM EDT
[#25]
Well, I've got the lower together.

I used an H&R GX-5857 gray receiver, an ORI 607 stock, an H&R gray LPK and an A1 grip that matches the stock finish with regard to the level of "mottled".

Still waiting on the H&R upper (w/FA) since the "Colt gray" I have didn't match the lower receiver color very well.  Also waiting for my Colt barrel to come back from ADCO - should arrive late this week.  I got two sets of triangle handguards from Numrich and I'll pick one to cut down per the instructions Shane733 offered above.  I'm a bit nervous doing that, but considering the HG's are fairly inexpensive all things considered, it should be OK.

The ORI stock is actually really cool and well done, though there is a bit of lateral play to it - not much more than an CAR or M4 stock.

The finish on the receiver is a stark difference from the mottled and slightly worn finish on the grip and stock.
Link Posted: 4/30/2024 9:45:16 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Shane733] [#26]
I started out building a M16A1 in like 2022. As I was buying parts, I ran across some parts for a 607 so I said what the heck, ill build one them too. So for well over a year I had the fear of cutting 5 decade old handguards up and ruining them in my head. Then somewhere in 2023 I ran across these real USGI right handguards for $2.49 (Think they were dated 1984) - https://armysurpluswarehouse.com/m16-triangle-forearm-right-side-only/

I think I ordered 6 of them. Didn't want to get greedy so left some for other retro builders. I figured I would start with cutting one them to see how it fit and set in there. Not long after I ordered a set from Numrich. The left one was ok but the right had broken teeth. Few weeks later I ordered another 2 sets. Same thing. Lefts ok but rights had broken teeth. Numrich is a no questions asked return place. They even give you a return label to print out. So I ended up sending all them broke right ones back and just keeping the good left ones to go with my NOS right ones. Scuffed the NOS ones up some, they matched the surplus ones ok.

So in the end, I was not going to feel as bad if I messed a couple up cutting them but it worked great for me. First cuts worked great. They did take some work to get in there. Lots of sharp edges and lots of pressure to get them in there. Take your time. Some just use a hacksaw. I went real slow and the miter saw worked great for me.

Rights are the NOS. Lefts are Numrich surplus - https://imgur.com/a/kzxvJ8f
Link Posted: 5/2/2024 8:19:13 PM EDT
[#27]
Well, I cut the handguards.  I used reproduction triangle handguards to see how well I did and tried some test cuts toward the rear where I wouldn't be using that part.  They actually came out perfectly when measured with the pre-made carbine triangle handguards when I put the cap on the end.  Exact same size.  Whew - wasn't that bad.  Thank you so much for the instructions and specifics.  The only thing I did differently was I put some masking tape where I didn't want to cut so that I'd make sure to get the perfect cut.

Still waiting on the upper receiver and my barrel to come back from ADCO.
Link Posted: 5/3/2024 12:26:01 AM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By jtb33:
Well, I cut the handguards.  I used reproduction triangle handguards to see how well I did and tried some test cuts toward the rear where I wouldn't be using that part.  They actually came out perfectly when measured with the pre-made carbine triangle handguards when I put the cap on the end.  Exact same size.  Whew - wasn't that bad.  Thank you so much for the instructions and specifics.  The only thing I did differently was I put some masking tape where I didn't want to cut so that I'd make sure to get the perfect cut.

Still waiting on the upper receiver and my barrel to come back from ADCO.
View Quote

Link Posted: 5/3/2024 4:02:09 PM EDT
[#29]
Barrel came back from ADCO today.  Here's some of the build so far...



H&R GX-5758 receiver
H&R LPK
A1 original grip
ORI 607 stock from original A1 stock, cut
cut-down triangle handguards
Colt C MP 11.5" barrel cut down to 10" by ADCO and gas port adjusted
Colt FSB w/A1 sight
607 moderator w/rebated muzzle end to look like the real one

Still waiting on:
- H&R A1 upper receiver (no shell deflector, but has teardrop FA)
- chromed BCG
- appropriately sized (thickness) split/lock washer
- Approved F1
Link Posted: 5/3/2024 5:29:32 PM EDT
[Last Edit: TheYellowThing] [#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By jtb33:
Barrel came back from ADCO today.  Here's some of the build so far...

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53696473151_04dccd45ac_k.jpg

H&R GX-5758 receiver
H&R LPK
A1 original grip
ORI 607 stock from original A1 stock, cut
cut-down triangle handguards
Colt C MP 11.5" barrel cut down to 10" by ADCO and gas port adjusted
Colt FSB w/A1 sight
607 moderator w/rebated muzzle end to look like the real one

Still waiting on:
- H&R A1 upper receiver (no shell deflector, but has teardrop FA)
- chromed BCG
- appropriately sized (thickness) split/lock washer
- Approved F1
View Quote
From where did you source the moderator? I picked up the TIA type from Palmetto State. The open end doesn't look right on a 607, imo.


Also, that is looking good!
Link Posted: 5/3/2024 5:32:51 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TheYellowThing:
From where did you source the moderator? I picked up the TIA type from Palmetto State. The open end doesn't look right on a 607, imo.

View Quote
I got it here:  https://www.ar15.com/exchange/topicEE.html?t=2433052&f=159&type=1
Link Posted: 5/3/2024 5:34:41 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By jtb33:
I got it here:  https://www.ar15.com/exchange/topicEE.html?t=2433052&f=159&type=1
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By jtb33:
Originally Posted By TheYellowThing:
From where did you source the moderator? I picked up the TIA type from Palmetto State. The open end doesn't look right on a 607, imo.

I got it here:  https://www.ar15.com/exchange/topicEE.html?t=2433052&f=159&type=1
That is awesome.
Link Posted: 5/3/2024 6:56:30 PM EDT
[#33]
Looks great so far
Link Posted: 5/3/2024 7:53:34 PM EDT
[#34]
So as I understand it, there were only about 50 of these made by Colt and they were all pretty much "parts bin" builds with a mix of uppers and muzzle devices and grips (both handguards and pistol grip lengths).  But that the most common version had an A1 receiver with teardrop FA, the full length A1 pistol grip, the cut down handguards using the thinner side of the handguards and the 607 style 3.5" moderator rather than the XM177 or 3-prong style.  I can't find whether they used chromed BCG's or phosphate BCG's, but pics I have seen of real ones seem to have shown that both were used.

Is that correct?


Link Posted: 5/3/2024 8:10:38 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Kalahnikid] [#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By jtb33:
So as I understand it, there were only about 50 of these made by Colt and they were all pretty much "parts bin" builds with a mix of uppers and muzzle devices and grips (both handguards and pistol grip lengths).  But that the most common version had an A1 receiver with teardrop FA, the full length A1 pistol grip, the cut down handguards using the thinner side of the handguards and the 607 style 3.5" moderator rather than the XM177 or 3-prong style.  I can't find whether they used chromed BCG's or phosphate BCG's, but pics I have seen of real ones seem to have shown that both were used.

Is that correct?


View Quote


https://www.ar15.com/forums/AR-15/Colt-Model-607-GX-5857-Photo-Refrence-Thread/123-783554/

Look for yourself. Note thats a thread for pictures and reference material on original Colt 607's, not cloner questions.

One of the reasons I started the thread was to try and figure out how many were made originally. I think we have the forward assist versions in a window of 200 serial numbers, but the slick side versions I have no idea.

The 607 from the thread on the West Point Museum:

https://imgur.com/a/c9Xifdi
Link Posted: 5/3/2024 8:54:57 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Shane733] [#36]
I been saving pictures of 607s for like 2 years now. Most all the old pictures taken of 607s before like 1970s are of 607s with slick side uppers and the 3 prong flash hider. Most all the pictures I have that were taken in the last 20-30 years are of 607s in museums and they have the FA and moderator. I even questioned were all the ones in museums made by someone like John Norrell rewelding demilled lowers maybe back in the 1970s and they ended up donated to museums. Also the original 607 stock patient has the stock made with the "L" on the left and the "O" on the right. Just little things you notice when you go down the 607 rabbit hole.

I went with the slick side and 3 prong. Buds Gun Shop had their Brownells chrome slide side BCGs on sale few weeks ago for a tad under $100. I was not paying attention and grabbed a semi-auto one. My OCD has been bothering me ever since. Time I realized what I done, they had already shipped so I just kept it. I like the chome ones in the 607 though. FA or slick side, chrome seems like it would been their choice back then.
Link Posted: 5/3/2024 10:13:42 PM EDT
[#37]
Chromed BCG it is...

Thanks to both of you for the above info.

Also, I just realized that the Sherluk triangle handguard cap I got - appears that I need to cut it or drill it for the gas tube to be able to work on it.
Link Posted: 5/4/2024 12:36:24 AM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By jtb33:

Also, I just realized that the Sherluk triangle handguard cap I got - appears that I need to cut it or drill it for the gas tube to be able to work on it.
View Quote


Mine worked but it did seem like the cap wanted to grab on the gas tube some. I took a little round chainsaw file and run it across the slot a couple times till it felt like it didn't want to grab onto it. Then I had like some 2000 grit sandpaper laying there I round up and smoothed the slot like glass. Cap then slid fine when I pulled it back to install handguards. I just figured the gas tube I got, maybe the manufacture just made it a thousands bigger than normal.
Link Posted: 5/8/2024 11:40:11 AM EDT
[#39]
I finally got 95% of the parts and have the build together.  Still waiting on the correct lock washer.

This is the first time I've handled a 607.  I've got an XM177E2 (629) and XM177 (610) - all SBR's.  My initial impressions and thoughts on the 607:

1) It's heavy.  Seems to be just as heavy as my full-size 604 build.
2) The front handguards have some rotational play.  I think that's a function of the triangle cap not indexing on the teeth of the barrel nut, unlike CAR handguards.  But the cut triangle handguards within the caps are solid - took some effort to get them to go in - the play is at the slip ring.
3) The rear stock (ORI) also has a bit of rotational play.  It's solid when collapsed.  When open, if it were to be torqued with a moderate amount of force, I fear it would break or crack the stock.
4) It's a cool, unique and visually striking carbine - though I can see why it's clearly inferior in almost every way to the subsequent carbines in the XM177, XM177E1 and XM177E2.
5) Despite the cost, I do not regret building it.  Expect to pay $2-$3K depending upon how accurate you want it to be, the quality of the components and timeframe.  If you wait for certain parts to pop up, you can often get them for very cheap since it's an uncommon build and demand for the parts are fairly low.  If you want to have it *now*, you can get the parts, but they aren't cheap and you will pay more.
Link Posted: 5/8/2024 7:14:06 PM EDT
[#40]
As for the OR 607 stock. It is a good quality stock. I chose to not stake the buffer tube. Instead I put teflon tape on the threads. Then tightened the tube down with a strap wrench.
Link Posted: 5/8/2024 7:29:54 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By timkel:
As for the OR 607 stock. It is a good quality stock. I chose to not stake the buffer tube. Instead I put teflon tape on the threads. Then tightened the tube down with a strap wrench.
View Quote
It doesn't seem to be the threads.  Rather, it's that both of the holes in the stock for the receiver extension and the 'strut' on the bottom seem a bit wider than would be ideal, so there is some torsional rotation/play.  I could probably address that by adding some velcro or electrical tape to the inside of the stock if it bothers me too much.
Page AR-15 » AR-15 / M-16 Retro Forum
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top